All you thin teenagers outside there. Write to him on the black board three hundred times. The anorexia is not a disease.

You can know that I made some articles on the anorexia, depriving yourselves of food to carry out the thinness, which raised a storm of fire of the answers angry on my line of maintenance, the majority of young women. When they did not call me a sonofabitch or a moron or some other names of choice like the lard-ass.

I precisely prove to like my Ass. I have beautiful Ass. It is my best part (you should see me in a belt of Scot).

When they were not to call named, they always quoted same the three protests, this I necessary to study the anorexia, that I could not include/understand the anorexia, that it was theirs disease and not with me, and that I did not have a right to speak about something which was their with me of thing. not.

I beat a retreat, to say I can present his observations on something which I want, and that I should not study the anorexia to know that to deprive itself of food to resemble a model of mode to the TV is erroneous. I also known as that the film, industries of TV and store had made to physical perfection distorts a desirable goal so that the young women die of hunger, denying their bodies of the food which they have need.

The angry comments continued during years.

They always say that (check my line of maintenance) it is a disease. The anorexia is not a disease. We with the American dictionary of heritage refer. The disease is defined as a state of a organization which deteriorates physiological operation, resulting from the causes such as the infection, the genetic defect, or the environmental effort.

With the anorexia, I do not see any organization. Do you make? Where is the organization? I do not see any infection. Where is the infection? I do not see any genetic defect either. Environmental effort?

I see a teenager who looks in store seventeen, and want to resemble the thin model in the image. Thus, she refuses to eat, and lies to her family which she eats, and endangers her health. It must be the environmental effort.

If you choose to do it. If it is well chosen, it is not a disease. It is not like cancer, where a cell is badly, or the AIDS, where the immune system of the body breaks up. To deprive itself of food of food that you have need is not a disease, but a constraint.

Do not shake your osseous finger with me and do not call me a join-head.

You must become true. You must also eat. The reason you invite it that a disease is a psychological tactic, to free itself from the personal liabilities of your own actions. It facilitates it much explaining it far which the manner rather than indicate, I am right a deaf-mute person who is in deteriorating my health because I have insecurities about the manner that I seem caused by the images of magazine painted with the aerosol of the famous models.

I never once sought to the minimum to reduce the pain of these people or the danger to their health posed by their choices of lifestyle. The choice is the mot. If you choose it (dying of hunger), it is your choice.

With cancer, a true disease, I cannot make the simple choice not to have it. I have it, and I have it. Obtain it? Good!